Sunday, July 7, 2019

Top 10 Things Fetzer Can Do To Raise $1 Million

Throwback to Jim's first award from F.A.R.T.

10...Take his magic act to Vegas where he pulls ridiculous statements out of his ass.

9... Combine efforts with Raff* to convert their unsold books to toilet paper.

8...Contract with Party City to inflate balloons at 10 cents a blow.

7...Hook up with Judyth and then abscond with her various medical fundraiser accounts.

6...Get Larry Rivera to morph a $1 bill into a $1,000,000,000 bill.

5...Sell tickets in Israel to watch Don Fox shove his "Da Jooos did it" bell up his ass.

4...Open a dunking booth at Judyth's next conference.

3...Become Depend® Adult Incontinence Products' next spokesman.

2...Convince Kraft-Heinz to let him start his own version of Planter's Mixed Nuts.

1...Sue the University of Minnesota - Duluth for granting him the title of McKnight Professor of Philosophy Emeritus and giving him the false sense of intelligence that got him into his current dilemma.

Thursday, July 4, 2019

The Fetzering Is In The Details OR: 35 Years of PhD Is No Match For Common Sense

Well, it took some digging, but I finally found the paper trail for Jim Fetzer's momentous loss to Noah Pozner's Dad.

Let me set the scene. A Civil Trial can be boiled down to a simple process. Individual A serves notice on Individual B that Individual A is hauling Individual B's ass into court for some perceived wrong. In this case, Lenny Pozner had enough of Jim Fetzer's bloviations over the years and decided that in his opinion, Jim Fetzer had defamed him by claiming that Lenny wasn't Lenny, that Lenny didn't have a son named Noah, that Noah wasn't a real person and that Noah didn't die in the mass shooting known as Sandy Hook. Jim Fetzer's claims have been debunked in numerous places but being proven wrong has never stopped Jim Fetzer from continuing to show his stupidity.

Now, in a civil trial, there's some back and forth between parties to set the ground rules of what will be decided, what will be offered by each side to back their claims and who will be a witness for each side, all before a hearing in front of a Judge. The court sets deadlines for submission of material and responses to any material submitted. There are depositions taken of witnesses, and documents passed between the litigants (through the court) where they offer their respective "facts" to back up their claims, attach documents of proof, then stipulate to those thing the other side says, that they will agree with or not contest. They also declare which of the other side's fact they dispute and give reasons as to why.

Individual A (hereafter the Plaintiff) in this case submitted a Motion For Summary Judgment, which in plain-speak is a document stating that here's the evidence that proves my claim beyond a doubt and therefore I want the Judge to decide that based on this evidence, I have sufficiently proved my claim and there is no need to take this to trial and Individual B (hereafter the Defendant) can go suck eggs...or in other words...the Judge says Plaintiff wins, Defendant loses.

The Defendant, in this case, also submitted a Motion For Summary Judgment so the Judge will basically find for one side or the other. In doing so, finding for one side, he automatically dismisses the losing side's motion or request.

Leading up to this hearing, Lenny Pozner requested a DNA test comparing his DNA to his deceased son Noah's DNA. His lawyer prepared the necessary material, paperwork, including the documentation for the chain of custody of the DNA samples, and proof of his son's existence.

As this process progressed, I could only follow the schedule listed at the Wisconsin Courts website and had a pretty good idea what was transpiring. I predicted a major ass kicking for Fetzer and turns out I was correct. I have copies of all motions filed, the responses to facts and Fetzer's affidavit but the only thing that matters of the hearing......everything is covered there. Please take the time to read it to the end. I think it shows better than anything else, how the term "Fetzering" is defined.

Here is the transcript for the hearing for the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judment...

Jim Fetzer has been relying on his 35 years of teaching critical thinking as the basis for demanding that people not question anything he says. It's sad to think that parents paid good money to the University of Minnesota to have this educated idiot instruct their kids.

Jim Fetzer has described himself as a "devastating intellectual machine"....

The asshat can't even grasp the concept of evidence.