Noun: 1. The act of making an unfounded or unsubstantiated claim.
2. In philosophy, a method of debate or discussion based of the premise of: I think, therefore I am. I think you're wrong, therefore you are.
3. The act of disagreeing by employing rancor, name calling, ad hominem attacks or straw man argument.
I have to ask. Let's consider the following.... Lee Harvey Oswald's name popped up in places he shouldn't or couldn't have been. Did they pop up as a result of someone actually engaging in interactions with people or did they pop up after the fact in documentation? Was Oswald simply a name appropriated by the powers that be? Or was Ozzy an OP? Raff* screams no. The Judyth says yes. Fetzer backs The Judyth. Not sure what Geraldo thinks. Not sure I care. Could the "powers that be" have decided to simply use the name Oswald and gotten hugely pissed when the real Ozzy decided to "make himself famous", long before Raff* could do so, and muck up the operation? Is that why they took him out? Were the "powers that be" hoping for a different outcome because of the assassination, only to see their plans go south? Consider the following..... Jim Fetzer hasn't done any research in to JFK. None. What he has done is gather together different work product from others and condense it into a poorly edited books and sell them. If something is disproved, it's someone else's problem, not Jim's. Raff* is an opportunist. He spins some crap past Jabba and he's suddenly the golden child. How many of Fetzer's books have a section written by Raff*? The Judyth has books. Jabba has books. Richard and Larry have a book. Did someone put Cinque and Fetzer together for a purpose? Is the name Cinque simply a company name?
Did someone take advantage of a random individual's pure bad luck? Easiest way to assume an identity is to take over one of someone, that actually lived and died. Social Security account is already set up....DMV records already exist.
Let's apply some OIC logic to things. Consider this....
Ralph Cinque disappears at 19, by jumping into a river to escape the flames of a massive blaze in New York.
Raff* Sink claimed to have lived in New York, with ties to law enforcement.
Now consider this.......
1965....Ralph Cinque goes to camp.
Raff* Sink claims to have left New York and moved to California.
Remember that we're applying OIC logic to the matter...
Next we see the name Cinque re-appear in the mid-70's in the form of a radical, convicted felon and self appointed Field Marshall of the Symbionese Liberation Army. Field Marshal Cinque (Donald DeFreeze) escapes from Soledad Prison, goes underground and forms his Army. Cinque turns out to be a certified schitzo that goes on to kidnap newspaper heiress, Patty Hearst. Cinque has been linked to various Police departments and is rumored to have been a MK-Ultra camper while in prison.
Wikipedia describes Cinque"s last hibachi party.....
On May 17, 1974, the Los Angeles Police Department surrounded a house where DeFreeze and five other SLA members were staying. The stand-off quickly escalated into an all-out battle with both sides trading fire using automatic weapons. The house caught fire during the shootout (possibly from a smoke grenade). DeFreeze and others crawled through a hole in the floor into a crawlspace beneath the house, where they continued to fire at police until the crawlspace likely caught fire. Apparently burning alive, DeFreeze committed suicide by shooting himself in the right side of his head with a pistol. He was the final fatality during the shootout. His corpse was so severely burned that his family did not initially believe the remains belonged to DeFreeze.
Cinque is Italian for 5.....as in MI-5 (Domestic Security UK)
The current Cinque seems to be on a mission to discredit the entire JFK research community. Irrational screams emanate from the OIC blogsite on a daily basis, giving pause to the rational, as they ponder the implications of Raff*'s delusions of grandeur. Raff*'s spiraled a little further down the rabbit hole with each year that passes. He's taken the one "theyory" that was the easiest to debunk, well past the point of interest.
Is someone getting a pass by certain entities that would normally lower the boom on someone that has violated several laws in their questionable business endeavors?
Is someone getting a pass?
Or is someone just another flaming asshat that happens to be undergoing some additional scrutiny because they THOUGHT they were getting a pass?
It may explain some peculiar behaviors resulting in Raff*'s brushes with the law, due to lapses in lucidity.
We're currently tracking down reports of Raff* receiving a citation for not paying admittance to a State Park. Apparently, Raff* and an unnamed male companion were heading into the woods in an area known for clandestine operations ( IF ya know what I mean)....when ticketed, Raff* showed his ass and ended up getting his truck towed. We're currently researching the citations and will post our findings.
We'll get back to patty purveyor Raff* in a bit. Now, I'm going to discuss the antics of Oswald Incompetent Clown Chairman Larry Rivera. Larry has as good a track record when it comes to JFK, as his namesake Geraldo Rivera has, exploring mob boss vaults.
They both come up empty...
Larry comes in next to next to last in the order of lousiest OIC photo critic, worsted only by Raff* and Richard Hooke.
At the end of last year, Larry was able to secure an interview with Mr. Roy Lewis. Lewis was an employee of the Texas School Book Depository on the day that Kennedy was assassinated. There has been some debate as to the identity of Roy Lewis, as an individual captured in the Altgens 6 photo. In Lewis' own statement to the FBI, he claimed to have been standing on the inside of the front entrance.
Some people interpret Lewis' words to mean that he was actually inside the lobby, looking through the glass at everyone on the top step or landing at the entrance. In the interview, Lewis says that he is standing outside and being the last person to go out. That would put him at the rear of the crowd on the landing.
This is an important issue, in that, Lewis would have been right next to the only door leading into the front of the building. He would have seen anyone coming in or leaving at the time of the shooting. As crowded as the landing was, it would seem impossible for someone to move through the crowd and swing open a large glass door, without someone having to move out of the way.
When the time came for Larry to extract some excellent information from Roy Lewis, Larry Rivera blew it. Large time.
Larry led Roy Lewis right down the rabbit hole to a false confession.
I am going to link to Larry's video about the interview. I make it a practice to never link to blatant dis-info but in this case I think it's necessary. Larry Rivera broke every ground rule of objectivity resulting in a leading and suggestive interview. If Roy Lewis was guilty of a crime, and Larry Rivera was the cop that got Roy to admit he was there in the photo at the time of the crime, even the worst attorney would be able to get him a not guilty verdict, but also prevail in a multi-million dollar settlement for Rivera's tactics.
Here is a crop from Robin's original post on the subject....
Photo Credit: Tony Frantini via Robin Unger
This photo collage was never shown to Roy Lewis. Instead, Larry Rivera used a crop of Altgens and a copy of the center photo (Skaggs) to get Roy Lewis to agree that he was actually Carl Jones.
The Cow Pie Posse has known of the above photo since April of 2015 and yet they purposely avoided to show it to Roy Lewis.
While discussing events of the day with Roy, Larry brought up the floor laying crew. He frames the discussion as if the crew wasn't laying new plywood down because, as he says..."you need carpenters to do that..... because you have to cut plywood...to measure up to the areas there.....a carpenter would have to do that, not an order filler."
The OIC maintains that you have to be a professional carpenter to rip a piece of plywood and nail it to an existing hardwood floor.
Larry goes on to say...." It's like I said, I've examined every photograph of the sixth floor and I ain't not seen any tools, anything that would indicate that type of work I mean that's a an a involved a operation, you know, you need... you have to bring plywood up there. How big were those floors? You know you would have to have stacks of plywood. ..."
Larry Rivera has examined every photograph of the sixth floor.....
EXCEPT HIS OWN DAMN PHOTOGRAPH
Larry Rivera has examined every photograph of the sixth floor and has seen nothing to indicate that type of work.
There is a web site called the Portal to Texas History. 6th graders have been clicking on it for years for school reports and like endeavors. You would think the prestigious researchers of the OIC would be capable of finding these examples....I guess they should have hired a professional 6th grader.
Larry guessed correctly. You would need stacks of plywood. And having stacks of plywood on moveable carts would be DA BOMB!
Funny how a bunch of order fillers were smart enough to figure that out.
But, according to Larry, OIC Member Willie "the half brain" Knowles, is a professional carpenter and he says that only a professional carpenter could rip plywood and nail it to an existing hardwood floor.
I guess there's some gullible people within range of Willie "the half brain" Knowles, if he can make a wage spoutin" such hooey.
Here's a clearer copy of Larry's picture showing the non-existent tools.....
Hmmmmmm....you would think Willie "the half brain" Knowles would be able to pick out a carpenter's square bein' as how he's a profeshunal and all......
The Cow Pie Posse (know as the largest purveyors of manure in the JFK world) uses the same method that Judyth Very Baker uses, they stack their crap one pie at a time.Over the last several years they have become know by several monikers....
The Bullshit Brigade
Purveyors of Poop
The CaCa Cartel
The Buda Bullshitters
The Lying Asshats
Yippie Ki-Yay Mudder Ruckers....
Let's pick up where we left off in the prelude.
Raff* Sink is the expert at the OIC. A washed up, ex-chiropractor, Raff* comes into the JFK world with a long ago debunked claim with a twist. Based on his extensive hookups with trannies off Craigs list, Raff* convinced the great Jim Fetzer that he was a clothing expert and could prove that Billy Lovelady in the Altgens 6 photo, wasn't Billy Lovelady at all.
To prove this claim, Raff* plays all kinds of shell games with the photographic evidence, even creating his own unscientific "experiments" to bolster his position.
Remember this from my last post....
Raff* is referring to this photo collage he created...
We covered Raff*'s comical attempt at trying to recreate the Altgens photo in earlier posts so our discussion today will be limited.
To begin with, Raff*'s photo on your left proves that his photographer was no where near the spot where Ike Altgens took his photo. The "pillars" Raff* compares are not the same "pillars". On your right, you see a small crop of Altgens 6, showing Billy Lovelady standing in the doorway. The "pillar" he is standing behind is the actual column at the corner of the doorway.
Photo credit: Robin Unger
Raff*'s photo on the left shows that he is comparing the obelisk seen above, to the column at the corner of the doorway, as seen here.....
But I'll let Raff* explain his deception.
Raff* has been told by several people that his dead hero and owner of the coattails upon which he rides,( it's easier to ride the coattails when the owner's dead) refers to the FBI doing a reenactment and fucking it up, (though not nearly as bad a Raff*).
Raff*'s first step in photo analysis is to misrepresent all known reference sources. He will either misrepresent what a photo shows and argue against the misrepresentation or he will misrepresent what a photo shows and then use the misrepresentation as "proof" of something.
Case in point.....The "Black Man" in Altgens is Carl Jones. He's in not looking at the "east wall" of the doorway. He's looking out at Elm St., watching the last cars in the motorcade. The rest of his drivel about reaching, etc. has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
We'll look at Wiegman in a moment. Raff* has his photo stand-ins in the wrong place and his photographer is no where near Altgens' position, so he really has no way to make any claims about Altgens at all. But that doesn't stop Raff*.
Raff* is the only person I know of that claims that Carl Jones was "flush against the wall".
If Carl Jones was standing "flush against the wall", you wouldn't see the shadow he casts against the column.
There was no wall beside Carl Jones. He was standing next to the column at the corner of the entrance. The wall was behind him, to his right. As Raff* would say, "That's a fact".
Carl Jones is not looking at "the west wall" of the doorway either. You can clearly see that he moves his head and Billy Lovelady stretches upward to try to see down Elm St.
But Raff* continues:
Here is Raff*'s own photo that shows the handrail is no more than 3 inches +/- away from the corner of the block at the base of the column.....
Why didn't Raff* position his stand-in that way? Because Raff* depends on that word "assume". You have to engage in make believe to make Raff*'s claim work.
Raff*'s photographer purposely positioned himself to hide the doorway column behind the obelisk. Notice something else...his photographer is zooming in and out and he is constantly changing position.
If....big word for only two letters. We can kill the 'if' bird right now, because we have seen that Carl Jones was not flush against the wall in Wiegman. In actuality, Raff*'s photographer was standing west of Altgens' line of sight. 'If' he were to move east, to the correct alignment, even more of his stand-in would be exposed.
The only "leverage" involved in Raff*'s recreation is the lifting of the camera. Raff* is just a dumb ass.
Raff* provides a collage that in no way supports any of his claims....
This shows that a radical repositioning is possible in 4 seconds..just .look at Billy Lovelady...
Conclusion: Raff* Sink is a deceptive biotch. Maybe this will help him understand