Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Time To Call Judyth Out

After a brief, but very informative talk with Wim Dankbaar, Wim decided to go crying to Judyth, Queen of the Weaver Clan.

See Wim dodge the question here:

I can only guess that Wim is clueless when it comes to people and events outside of his bubble.

His bubble consists of a lot of attorneys:

But enough about Wim.

He went whining to Judyth Very Faker and this was her response...

Pay attention Judyth:

I have a blog, and a Facecrook page. I post at two Facecrook groups, one of which was created to discuss people like you. You have never been trolled by me, anywhere on the net. My blog accepts comments by anyone, including you, but you have decided to remain silent.

I took advantage of an opportunity, to ask a simple question of one of your supporters. He refused to answer the question.

I have challenged your conclusions of your "pixel analysis" of the Altgen's photo. I have shown clearly, that your initials are not on pay records from Riley Coffee. I have shown where your claims about keys on windowsills are fantasy.

You have taken the better part of your early life planning your moment of fame. It has taken you years to weave a tapestry of lies, embellishments and fabrications. You've spent as much time ripping out months of work and reweaving your creation as you have expanding your world of influence and fantasy.

I challenge you to produce one piece of irrefutable evidence of you being in a romantic relationship with Lee Harvey Oswald. Just one.

The only "witnesses" to your relationship, or any aspect of your interaction with Lee Harvey Oswald are people who you claim are witnesses and only became "witnesses" because you convinced them that they were. That's how con-artists work.

Dead people can't refute your claims.

I will take every opportunity to denounce you, your efforts and the "half brained", wignuts that inhabit your narcissistic world.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Never Eat At Raff*'s

Raff* seems to think everyone is interested in his back yard...'s your latest discovery of Lovelady's arrow.


But I do have a question.....Do you tell your guests at your starve-n-farm that you urinate daily...


That's pretty damn disgusting Raff*.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Well, That's One Mystery Solved

In September of 2015, Raff* Sink announced that the great Wim Dankbaar had joined the OIC. But it was the shortest tenure in the group's history. Many noticed that within hours of the announcement, Wim had disappeared from the Senior Class picture.

Enter fate and the eternal optimist, me .....

I noticed that Wim had replied to a question posed by Kleep Klopp, so I took advantage of the situation and asked Dim just why he left the group. Speculation was, it was due to Raff* trashing his (Dim's) sugar granny, Judyth Very Faker.

Turns out I was correct....

There you have it. The Great Wim Dankbaar thinks Raff* is full of shit. No big surprise there, but it explains why Raff* refused to answer our inquiries about Dim.

The conversation continues....

I think I pissed off Wim...but I knew every wingnut worth their weight in SPAM always had one comeback left in them...

Ever notice when a crank gets cornered, the first thing they try to do is put the spotlight on someone else?

I guess while we wait we can venture over to Raff*'s place and see if he's got his panties out of his crack yet...

From Raff*'s Blog
Nope.....looks like he's gonna be a while....

Raff* Has His Head Up His Portal

Raff* Sink continues his fascination with Jack Ruby's knickers by making a return visit to the NEW JFK Show !!!

Dr. Sink* says, "I have proof that FBI Agent Bookhout's ass was no lower than this"
Raff* had gone on a week long rant about the fact that the Dallas Police confiscated Jack Ruby's underwear after arresting him for shooting Lee Oswald, in the basement parking area of the Dallas PD. Being a member of the Weaver Clan, headed up by Judyth Very Faker, Raff* has created a wonderful little fiction that goes "Once upon a time, an FBI Agent and not Jack Ruby, really shot Lee Oswald ". He's even gone so far as to say that there were two shootings of Oswald. Both fake.

So, one day during his panty period, Raff* made the astonishing claim that socks are underwear...

In fact, Raff* was quite perturbed that Oswald didn't get any underwear. None...the bastards.

So when I saw that Raff* was quite perplexed, I went and got a copy of the property receipt issued by the DPD, which showed that yes, they did confiscate Ruby's bloomers. I even boxed the entry in red so Raff* could see it easier...

Copy of Original from DPD Archives

But this wasn't good enough for Raff*. ...he immediately said it was a fake. He also said that his imaginary friend "the wheezer", said that he couldn't be sure the ink on the document was dry.

Soon after, Raff* continued his befuddlement. So Joe Backes posted copies from the Texas History Portal, one pink and one white..

From Joe Backes Blog

From Joe Backes Blog
This only led to more confusion for Raff*. We'll clarify the situation for him in a moment.

Joe Backes tried to explain that there were different color copies, and they used carbon paper but Raff* was having none of that.

Pay attention Raff*.

There are multiple "white copies" of the original white copy. I'll show you a few in a moment. But for now, forget everything Joe posted about carbon paper and colored copies. The original form consisted of a top white copy and a pink bottom copy.

Raff* apparently didn't like Joe Backes' reply to him, so he went on in another post...

Raff*, again, forget all that. There was one original white copy and one original pink copy. It was a two page, carbon-less form.There was no carbon paper. There are several white copies of the original white copy.

The reason my copy doesn't have a stamp is because my copy was a copy of the original, and located in a different file than the original. Joe Backes' white copy is a different copy of the original, than mine.


Here's the reverse side...


The files above are the original white copy and the original pink copy. The two sheets comprised a carbon-less form. There are several things about them that we need to discuss.

At the top of the pink original you can see the lighter pink area, where the adhesive was on the form. Notice also the fuzz on the upper edge of the paper. This is residue from the adhesive.

I also stated that there were multiple "white copies" of the original white copy. Look at any copy of the original. Count the number of circles at the top of the page, where the paper was punched and clipped into the file.

If you scroll back up to my copy, you will see two faint circles, both on the right and left where the original had two pre-punched holes and the copy picked up the hole, and then the copy was punched to place in the file. Below are several copies of the original...

A copy of a copy of a copy

A Copy of the Original
A Copy of the Original

How can I be positive that there were several copies? Just look at the back of the original...

"Four (4) copies of this invoice made & (or 8) ea given to Capt Fritz 3 Dec 1963

But Raff* wanted to find some problems in the forms themselves...

He didn't like the fact that one line of type was on a line. He then went into a spiel about a typewriter and the carriage return but apparently doesn't know a damn thing about single space vs. double space. On most forms, if you hit the return lever, the carriage returns. Hit it once more and it moves the page up a line. Look at the entire form and you will see, that the person typing it changed between single and double spaced lines throughout the form.

Raff* the went into a description of the Portal to Texas History and stated that he knew of no other site online, that had copies of the property receipts for Jack Ruby's drawers. The idiot forgot that on his blog, he copied and pasted the description of the web site for the Dallas Municipal Archives. He then stated that at the Texas Portal, he found a copy of a FBI report that listed property given to them by the DPD. He said that the clothes weren't listed. That's because the DPD didn't give Ruby's clothes to the FBI.

Now if Raff* was at the Texas Portal, you'd think that he'd look to see just what the Archive included. He stated emphatically that he couldn't find any other reference to Ruby's tightie whities.

But Raff* doesn't do research. He relies on other people to produce documents and then he just lifts them with a screen shot. Every document above was found at the Texas Portal.

There were notebook pages, apparently for an evidence book, where the items were listed alphabetically.

And here are the hand written notes used to generate the notebook...

Another massive fail by Raff* Sink.
Oswald's Incompetent Clowns are just that....

P.S. I almost forgot...Willie The Half Brain stopped by:

Monday, November 7, 2016


This is priceless. The idiot Raff* can't conceive that a color other than black or white, is going to show up as a shade of grey in a black and white photo.

Joe Backes just shot holes all in Raff*'s latest bag-o-gas ....

Raff* has a hard time accepting when he's wrong...

Hey Raff* attention.....

Oh and this photo wasn't taken right after Ruby was arrested. It was taken before his trial...

Will Joe Backes show the world that Raff* is an idiot again in the future?

I think you can bet Ruby's jock strap on it....