Let's go back a few years.....
Raff* decided one day to post this on his blog...
Do you notice anything about Raff*'s tail? Lance Uppercut did and he called out Raff* on his blog.
Lance's blog post is here: http://www.oswaldinthedoorway.com/2013/10/i-cant-stop-laughing.html
What Lance noticed was this...
Raff* drew a black line across the arm of the individual, then drew a white line over the end of of the black line and added two more lines to create an arrow point. Lance busted Raff* for being a hypocrite over drawing on photos.
Raff* immediately followed up with a post where he tried to make Lance out to be a liar and all he did was prove Lance to be correct.
Raff* has "never gone anywhere near that spot with anything black"...except when he drew a black line on the photo.
Raff* had whipped his new and improved, non-arrow arrow photo out the week before:
You may have trouble finding some of these posts on Raff*'s blog because after Lance busted him and Raff* proved Lance to be correct, Raff* took down several posts from his blog. Thanks to picasa and my archive of prior blog photos, we can bring you examples of the progression of "the arrow that never was".
Raff* tried to counter the thorough debunking he received by trying to explain how he came upon his brilliant discovery. Step by step he went through the process and even went so far as to claim he had found the complete arrow...
And again here, in his next blog post....
Unfortunately for Raff*, it was quickly pointed out to him that he was seeing the pixelation effect of his constant enlargement of the photo.
So the next day, Raff* decided to change tactics and took a copy of CE 369 from my blog, thinking he could make the past day go away. Little did he realize that 4 months later, I would point out his screw up in grand fashion. To this very day, Raff* refuses to admit that he proved the actual location of Lovelady's arrow.
Do you notice anything about, as Raff* calls it, Frazier's arrow? If you don't, you will in a moment. It was pointed out to Raff* that his enlargement of my copy of CE 369 proved that his "Lovelady's Arrow" disappeared.
So Raff* went back to the drawing board and kept manipulating the photo until he thought it showed what he was saying it showed.
OK......
There you have it....a discrete precise black blob. Several people have asked repeatedly, for Raff* to show us his arrow. He can't. He can't even show you the tail of the arrow he found because it's just a speck on this....
Raff* ignored the fact that his claim was totally blown out of the water and continued with his "tail of the arrow" crap until February of the next year, when he posted this...
Raff* has reverted back to his history matters copy and refused to admit that it shows this:
Raff*'s arrow is nothing more than a spot that is totally separate from the shadow line along the edge of the arm. That's it. Nothing more.
Then Raff* continues his blog post with this...
Kerplunk!
Raff* just dropped the turd in his own punch bowl....
Raff* has spent the last 2 years trying to dodge his photo. He always tries to attribute those two arrow marks to me and yet there they are in his blog post, in a photo he produced.
Raff* has tried to weave a narrative of a diabolical plot involving WC lawyers, Billy Lovelady, Government Agents, Law Enforcement officials, smearable marker ink, the physical requirements of making a pen stroke vs. an ink removing swipe and out of context statements in an effort to make his blunder more palatable.
He's even gone so far as to claim this...
Quick note: notice that his "tail of the arrow" on the left is a distinct dot and on the right, blurred severely.
Question Raff*....why did the ink "lift off" that drawn arrow and yet it didn't on your supposedly drawn arrow on the forearm? That one actually grew across the forearm to connect with the black area between the individual's arm and the person's head, below.
Raff* really takes this issue personally as you can see.....
I suggest you take your own advice Raff*...find your fucking arrow.
No comments:
Post a Comment