Raff* the lighting expert

Raff* the expert of everything shows his stupidity again......

NO ONE FLOODED ANYTHING YOU IDIOT!

If you knew anything about shooting pool or snooker, you'd know that in the shot on your left he is leaning over the table which puts him directly under the pool table light above.

Raff* is one dumb asshat...............

Here is Lance Uppercut's excellent debunking of Raff*'s crap from two years ago.....

http://www.oswaldinthedoorway.com/2014/06/zero-zip-zilch.html

Enjoy!

Deeper and Deeper

Raff* is oblivious to how comical he is.....

Let's provide an example that happened within the last 24 hours. Raff* just posted this.....

My initial post yesterday afternoon mentioned this. But Raff* has no attention span so let's do it again. But first, wasn't Raff* just saying the other day that two arrow points are not an arrow? Now a triangle is an arrow? So a dot constitutes a tail and a triangle is an arrow?

So we're now supposed to forget that Raff* posted this just the other day?

Sorry Raff*, according to your source at Google, your arrow ain't an arrow (huge shock I know).


Several posts have been removed from Raff*'s blog by Raff*. He forgets that people have screen shots of his past posts.

Here is where I addressed Raff*'s triangle years ago...

And here is where Raff* says why he likes this photo...

He posted that just a few hours ago but now he complains...

Raff* Sink is a hypocritical bitch....

Raff* Cements His Hypocrisy

Only Raff*.....

Oh you can't Raff*? No digitally altered photos? Well, then you just dismissed every photo on your blog and the entire premise of the OIC.

Photos like this...

And this...

Or this....

Or even this from just a few hours ago....

So there you have it. We could post more than 100 examples of Raff*'s hypocritical renderings but why waste the time?

Raff* leaves us with some very important instructions....

OK....let's do that.....

Now...how about you run along and find that "fucking arrow".

All the lip flappin' in the world....

Can't make it go away.................

Raff*'s has been crankin' out the propaganda all night. 8 posts since mine, yesterday afternoon.

You can tell when you get to Raff*.

This speaks for itself Raff*...thanks for the contribution to the truth, they happen so rarely where you're concerned.

Keep diggin Raff*

Damn, Raff*'s been trying to dig his way out of this one all afternoon.....

Why rely on Raff*'s what ifs? Raff* has been weaving a story for years. Much like his fellow weaver-class member Judyth Very Faker.

We have the transcript of what happened and what was said....

Lovelady stated where he was. Standing as you were going down the steps on the right.

Ball stated that he had a picture and asked Lovelady if he was on it.

Lovelady stated that he was.

Ball directed Lovelady to mark the picture.

Lovelady indicated where he was in the picture.

Ball directed Lovelady to draw an arrow down to where he just indicated.

Ball stated that Lovelady drew an arrow down to himself and that there were two arrows pointing towards him on the photo, where Lovelady indicated he was.

Ball asked Lovelady where he was when the picture he just marked was taken.

Lovelady described where he was AND INDICATED WHERE HE WAS A SECOND TIME.

According to Ball, there were two arrows pointing to the same person indicated by Billy Lovelady twice.

No need for make believe....we have Raff*'s excellent photo work.........

Round and round he goes.....

Raff* found it necessary to revert to history matters to try and deflect attention away from the fact that his arrow has no point....

Try again Raff*.

Much Like Raff*, His Arrow Has No Point

Poor Raff*. He's really backed himself into a corner over this Lovelady's arrow delusion. Just last week we were getting post after post about his famous "Lovelady's Arrow". The only problem with Raff*'s arrow is, it doesn't exist.....

Let's go back a few years.....

Raff* decided one day to post this on his blog...

Do you notice anything about Raff*'s tail? Lance Uppercut did and he called out Raff* on his blog.

Lance's blog post is here:  http://www.oswaldinthedoorway.com/2013/10/i-cant-stop-laughing.html

What Lance noticed was this...

Raff* drew a black line across the arm of the individual, then drew a white line over the end of of the black line and added two more lines to create an arrow point. Lance busted Raff* for being a hypocrite over drawing on photos.

Raff* immediately followed up with a post where he tried to make Lance out to be a liar and all he did was prove Lance to be correct.

Raff* has "never gone anywhere near that spot with anything black"...except when he drew a black line on the photo.

Raff* had whipped his new and improved, non-arrow arrow photo out the week before:

You may have trouble finding some of these posts on Raff*'s blog because after Lance busted him and Raff* proved Lance to be correct, Raff* took down several posts from his blog. Thanks to picasa and my archive of prior blog photos, we can bring you examples of the progression of "the arrow that never was".

Raff* tried to counter the thorough debunking he received by trying to explain how he came upon his brilliant discovery. Step by step he went through the process and even went so far as to claim he had found the complete arrow...

And again here, in his next blog post....

Unfortunately for Raff*, it was quickly pointed out to him that he was seeing the pixelation effect of his constant enlargement of the photo.

So the next day, Raff* decided to change tactics and took a copy of CE 369 from my blog, thinking he could make the past day go away. Little did he realize that 4 months later, I would point out his screw up in grand fashion. To this very day, Raff* refuses to admit that he proved the actual location of Lovelady's arrow.

Do you notice anything about, as Raff* calls it, Frazier's arrow? If you don't, you will in a moment. It was pointed out to Raff* that his enlargement of my copy of CE 369 proved that his "Lovelady's Arrow" disappeared.

So Raff* went back to the drawing board and kept manipulating the photo until he thought it showed what he was saying it showed.

OK......

There you have it....a discrete precise black blob. Several people have asked repeatedly, for Raff* to show us his arrow. He can't. He can't even show you the tail of the arrow he found because it's just a speck on this....

Raff* ignored the fact that his claim was totally blown out of the water and continued with his "tail of the arrow" crap until February of the next year, when he posted this...

 Raff* has reverted back to his history matters copy and refused to admit that it shows this:

Raff*'s arrow is nothing more than a spot that is totally separate from the shadow line along the edge of the arm. That's it. Nothing more.

Then Raff* continues his blog post with this...

Kerplunk!

Raff* just dropped the turd in his own punch bowl....

Raff* has spent the last 2 years trying to dodge his photo. He always tries to attribute those two arrow marks to me and yet there they are in his blog post, in a photo he produced.

Raff* has tried to weave a narrative of a diabolical plot involving WC lawyers, Billy Lovelady, Government Agents, Law Enforcement officials, smearable marker ink, the physical requirements of making a pen stroke vs. an ink removing swipe and out of context statements in an effort to make his blunder more palatable.

He's even gone so far as to claim this...

Quick note: notice that his "tail of the arrow" on the left is a distinct dot and on the right, blurred severely.

 Question Raff*....why did the ink "lift off" that drawn arrow and yet it didn't on your supposedly drawn arrow on the forearm? That one actually grew across the forearm to connect with the black area between the individual's arm and the person's head, below.

Raff* really takes this issue personally as you can see.....

 

I suggest you take your own advice Raff*...find your fucking arrow.