Sunday, June 14, 2020

It Had To Be Said...


Liberal/Leftist/Progressive/Democrat orthodoxy mandates suppression of any opposing view. It is rare when someone from the ranks of an ultra-liberal institution actually speaks truth to power. When it is done, it's done under the smothering blanket of fear. This is one such case....

An anonymous history professor at U.C. Berkeley has penned an open letter against the current narratives of racial injustice underpinning the BLM movement and ongoing protests over the death of George Floyd.
Its authenticity was confirmed by Kentucky State University Assistant Professor of Political Science, Wilfred Reilley, who says he was sent a copy of the letter along with Stanford University economist Thomas Sowell.

The following is the text of that letter...

UC Berkeley History Professor's Open Letter Against BLM, Police Brutality and Cultural Orthodoxy
Dear profs X, Y, Z
I am one of your colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley. I have met you both personally but do not know you closely, and am contacting you anonymously, with apologies. I am worried that writing this email publicly might lead to me losing my job, and likely all future jobs in my field.

In your recent departmental emails you mentioned our pledge to diversity, but I am increasingly alarmed by the absence of diversity of opinion on the topic of the recent protests and our community response to them.

In the extended links and resources you provided, I could not find a single instance of substantial counter-argument or alternative narrative to explain the under-representation of black individuals in academia or their over-representation in the criminal justice system. The explanation provided in your documentation, to the near exclusion of all others, is univariate: the problems of the black community are caused by whites, or, when whites are not physically present, by the infiltration of white supremacy and white systemic racism into American brains, souls, and institutions.

Many cogent objections to this thesis have been raised by sober voices, including from within the black community itself, such as Thomas Sowell and Wilfred Reilly. These people are not racists or 'Uncle Toms'. They are intelligent scholars who reject a narrative that strips black people of agency and systematically externalizes the problems of the black community onto outsiders. Their view is entirely absent from the departmental and UCB-wide communiques.

The claim that the difficulties that the black community faces are entirely causally explained by exogenous factors in the form of white systemic racism, white supremacy, and other forms of white discrimination remains a problematic hypothesis that should be vigorously challenged by historians. Instead, it is being treated as an axiomatic and actionable truth without serious consideration of its profound flaws, or its worrying implication of total black impotence. This hypothesis is transforming our institution and our culture, without any space for dissent outside of a tightly policed, narrow discourse.

A counternarrative exists. If you have time, please consider examining some of the documents I attach at the end of this email. Overwhelmingly, the reasoning provided by BLM and allies is either primarily anecdotal (as in the case with the bulk of Ta-Nehisi Coates' undeniably moving article) or it is transparently motivated. As an example of the latter problem, consider the proportion of black incarcerated Americans. This proportion is often used to characterize the criminal justice system as anti-black. However, if we use the precise same methodology, we would have to conclude that the criminal justice system is even more anti-male than it is anti-black.

Would we characterize criminal justice as a systemically misandrist conspiracy against innocent American men? I hope you see that this type of reasoning is flawed, and requires a significant suspension of our rational faculties. Black people are not incarcerated at higher rates than their involvement in violent crime would predict. This fact has been demonstrated multiple times across multiple jurisdictions in multiple countries.

And yet, I see my department uncritically reproducing a narrative that diminishes black agency in favor of a white-centric explanation that appeals to the department's apparent desire to shoulder the 'white man's burden' and to promote a narrative of white guilt.

If we claim that the criminal justice system is white-supremacist, why is it that Asian Americans, Indian Americans, and Nigerian Americans are incarcerated at vastly lower rates than white Americans? This is a funny sort of white supremacy. Even Jewish Americans are incarcerated less than gentile whites. I think it's fair to say that your average white supremacist disapproves of Jews. And yet, these alleged white supremacists incarcerate gentiles at vastly higher rates than Jews. None of this is addressed in your literature. None of this is explained, beyond hand-waving and ad hominems. "Those are racist dogwhistles". "The model minority myth is white supremacist". "Only fascists talk about black-on-black crime", ad nauseam.

These types of statements do not amount to counterarguments: they are simply arbitrary offensive classifications, intended to silence and oppress discourse. Any serious historian will recognize these for the silencing orthodoxy tactics they are, common to suppressive regimes, doctrines, and religions throughout time and space. They are intended to crush real diversity and permanently exile the culture of robust criticism from our department.

Increasingly, we are being called upon to comply and subscribe to BLM's problematic view of history, and the department is being presented as unified on the matter. In particular, ethnic minorities are being aggressively marshaled into a single position. Any apparent unity is surely a function of the fact that dissent could almost certainly lead to expulsion or cancellation for those of us in a precarious position, which is no small number.

I personally don't dare speak out against the BLM narrative, and with this barrage of alleged unity being mass-produced by the administration, tenured professoriat, the UC administration, corporate America, and the media, the punishment for dissent is a clear danger at a time of widespread economic vulnerability. I am certain that if my name were attached to this email, I would lose my job and all future jobs, even though I believe in and can justify every word I type.

The vast majority of violence visited on the black community is committed by black people. There are virtually no marches for these invisible victims, no public silences, no heartfelt letters from the UC regents, deans, and departmental heads. The message is clear: Black lives only matter when whites take them. Black violence is expected and insoluble, while white violence requires explanation and demands solution. Please look into your hearts and see how monstrously bigoted this formulation truly is.

No discussion is permitted for nonblack victims of black violence, who proportionally outnumber black victims of nonblack violence. This is especially bitter in the Bay Area, where Asian victimization by black assailants has reached epidemic proportions, to the point that the SF police chief has advised Asians to stop hanging good-luck charms on their doors, as this attracts the attention of (overwhelmingly black) home invaders. Home invaders like George Floyd. For this actual, lived, physically experienced reality of violence in the USA, there are no marches, no tearful emails from departmental heads, no support from McDonald's and Wal-Mart. For the History department, our silence is not a mere abrogation of our duty to shed light on the truth: it is a rejection of it.

The claim that black intraracial violence is the product of redlining, slavery, and other injustices is a largely historical claim. It is for historians, therefore, to explain why Japanese internment or the massacre of European Jewry hasn't led to equivalent rates of dysfunction and low SES performance among Japanese and Jewish Americans respectively. Arab Americans have been viciously demonized since 9/11, as have Chinese Americans more recently. However, both groups outperform white Americans on nearly all SES indices - as do Nigerian Americans, who incidentally have black skin. It is for historians to point out and discuss these anomalies. However, no real discussion is possible in the current climate at our department. The explanation is provided to us, disagreement with it is racist, and the job of historians is to further explore additional ways in which the explanation is additionally correct. This is a mockery of the historical profession.

Most troublingly, our department appears to have been entirely captured by the interests of the Democratic National Convention, and the Democratic Party more broadly. To explain what I mean, consider what happens if you choose to donate to Black Lives Matter, an organization UCB History has explicitly promoted in its recent mailers. All donations to the official BLM website are immediately redirected to ActBlue Charities, an organization primarily concerned with bankrolling election campaigns for Democrat candidates. Donating to BLM today is to indirectly donate to Joe Biden's 2020 campaign. This is grotesque given the fact that the American cities with the worst rates of black-on-black violence and police-on-black violence are overwhelmingly Democrat-run. Minneapolis itself has been entirely in the hands of Democrats for over five decades; the 'systemic racism' there was built by successive Democrat administrations.

The patronizing and condescending attitudes of Democrat leaders towards the black community, exemplified by nearly every Biden statement on the black race, all but guarantee a perpetual state of misery, resentment, poverty, and the attendant grievance politics which are simultaneously annihilating American political discourse and black lives. And yet, donating to BLM is bankrolling the election campaigns of men like Mayor Frey, who saw their cities devolve into violence. This is a grotesque capture of a good-faith movement for necessary police reform, and of our department, by a political party. Even worse, there are virtually no avenues for dissent in academic circles. I refuse to serve the Party, and so should you.

The total alliance of major corporations involved in human exploitation with BLM should be a warning flag to us, and yet this damning evidence goes unnoticed, purposefully ignored, or perversely celebrated. We are the useful idiots of the wealthiest classes, carrying water for Jeff Bezos and other actual, real, modern-day slavers. Starbucks, an organisation using literal black slaves in its coffee plantation suppliers, is in favor of BLM. Sony, an organisation using cobalt mined by yet more literal black slaves, many of whom are children, is in favor of BLM. And so, apparently, are we. The absence of counter-narrative enables this obscenity. Fiat lux, indeed.

There also exists a large constituency of what can only be called 'race hustlers': hucksters of all colors who benefit from stoking the fires of racial conflict to secure administrative jobs, charity management positions, academic jobs and advancement, or personal political entrepreneurship.

Given the direction our history department appears to be taking far from any commitment to truth, we can regard ourselves as a formative training institution for this brand of snake-oil salespeople. Their activities are corrosive, demolishing any hope at harmonious racial coexistence in our nation and colonizing our political and institutional life. Many of their voices are unironically segregationist.

MLK would likely be called an Uncle Tom if he spoke on our campus today. We are training leaders who intend, explicitly, to destroy one of the only truly successful ethnically diverse societies in modern history. As the PRC, an ethnonationalist and aggressively racially chauvinist national polity with null immigration and no concept of jus solis increasingly presents itself as the global political alternative to the US, I ask you: Is this wise? Are we really doing the right thing?

As a final point, our university and department has made multiple statements celebrating and eulogizing George Floyd. Floyd was a multiple felon who once held a pregnant black woman at gunpoint. He broke into her home with a gang of men and pointed a gun at her pregnant stomach. He terrorized the women in his community. He sired and abandoned multiple children, playing no part in their support or upbringing, failing one of the most basic tests of decency for a human being. He was a drug-addict and sometime drug-dealer, a swindler who preyed upon his honest and hard-working neighbors.

And yet, the regents of UC and the historians of the UCB History department are celebrating this violent criminal, elevating his name to virtual sainthood. A man who hurt women. A man who hurt black women. With the full collaboration of the UCB history department, corporate America, most mainstream media outlets, and some of the wealthiest and most privileged opinion-shaping elites of the USA, he has become a culture hero, buried in a golden casket, his (recognized) family showered with gifts and praise. Americans are being socially pressured into kneeling for this violent, abusive misogynist. A generation of black men are being coerced into identifying with George Floyd, the absolute worst specimen of our race and species.

I'm ashamed of my department. I would say that I'm ashamed of both of you, but perhaps you agree with me, and are simply afraid, as I am, of the backlash of speaking the truth. It's hard to know what kneeling means, when you have to kneel to keep your job.

It shouldn't affect the strength of my argument above, but for the record, I write as a person of color. My family have been personally victimized by men like Floyd. We are aware of the condescending depredations of the Democrat party against our race. The humiliating assumption that we are too stupid to do STEM, that we need special help and lower requirements to get ahead in life, is richly familiar to us. I sometimes wonder if it wouldn't be easier to deal with open fascists, who at least would be straightforward in calling me a subhuman, and who are unlikely to share my race.

The ever-present soft bigotry of low expectations and the permanent claim that the solutions to the plight of my people rest exclusively on the goodwill of whites rather than on our own hard work is psychologically devastating. No other group in America is systematically demoralized in this way by its alleged allies. A whole generation of black children are being taught that only by begging and weeping and screaming will they get handouts from guilt-ridden whites.

No message will more surely devastate their futures, especially if whites run out of guilt, or indeed if America runs out of whites. If this had been done to Japanese Americans, or Jewish Americans, or Chinese Americans, then Chinatown and Japantown would surely be no different to the roughest parts of Baltimore and East St. Louis today. The History department of UCB is now an integral institutional promulgator of a destructive and denigrating fallacy about the black race.

I hope you appreciate the frustration behind this message. I do not support BLM. I do not support the Democrat grievance agenda and the Party's uncontested capture of our department. I do not support the Party co-opting my race, as Biden recently did in his disturbing interview, claiming that voting Democrat and being black are isomorphic. I condemn the manner of George Floyd's death and join you in calling for greater police accountability and police reform. However, I will not pretend that George Floyd was anything other than a violent misogynist, a brutal man who met a predictably brutal end.

I also want to protect the practice of history. Cleo is no grovelling handmaiden to politicians and corporations. Like us, she is free.

Friday, June 12, 2020

Democrats Hate White Supremacy ( no)

So does that make them self-loathing or revisionists? Since they deny their history my guess would be the latter. 

  Just the other day....I had a former friend post a cute little video on their Facecrook page. I watched it and posted a reply that apparently was the equivalent of a David Duke editorial. It not only resulted in this woman getting severely pissed enough to block me on Facecrook but to then compare me to Grand KKKolosal KKKrud Senator Robert Byrd (Dem. WV) and also the current plague encompassing the globe.
I am the perfect example of how deep white supremacy goes....Think about that. Based on my comments (of which I will go into detail) I am a better example of white supremacy than say, Gov. George Wallace (Dem, Alabama), Theophilus E. "Bull" Connor, Commissioner of Public Safety for the City of Birmingham (Dem. Alabama), Sen. William J. Fulbright (Dem. Arkansas),  President Lyndon Johnson (Dem. Texas). I have to laugh when I think about that last individual who, as a member of the House of Representatives, was quoted as saying..."I have voted against the so-called poll tax repeal bill. … I have voted against the so-called anti-lynching bill." And as a Senator, said..."“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days, and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness.”

The great Democrat fear....uppity Negroes with the power of a voting block. Little did Lyndon know that Blacks have stayed on the Democrat plantation to this day. American Economist Walter Williams, (who happens to be Black) relays the above quotes and more in an editorial here:

Now, let's get to that cute little video that started it the arrow to play.

Now, my ex-friend on Facecrook blocked me before my response to her little temper tantrum was posted so I'll post my comments here as we go through this great example of revisionist history.

To begin,, the creator of the video, is a propaganda arm of

Here is their photo from their website and as you can count, they have the prerequisite 13% Black people in the photo (4 out of 31 = 12.9%)

 But on their See Our Team page, they only have 1 possibly 2 Blacks listed out of 20 people. Not good by Democrat standards. It would almost suggest white supremacy on their part. But know full well that all of the people involved are on the far left spectrum within the Democrat party. You know, The Bernie wing.
Democrats and the organizations that they pimp out for donations love to demand that certain percentages are maintained and either scream like hell or completely disregard percentages when they are either advantageous or disadvantageous to their cause du jour.  An example would be when they shout out that in 2019, 24% of people killed by Police were Black even though they only make up 13% of the population. What they never scream or even acknowledge is that "According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2018 there were 593,598 interracial violent victimizations (excluding homicide) between blacks and whites in the United States. Blacks committed 537,204 of those interracial felonies, or 90.4 percent, while whites committed 56,394 of them, or about 9.5 percent".
No Democrat has ever told you that...

OK...the video....

It starts with this picture and goes downhill from there....

A cute little Klansman with this narration..." If we want to eradicate white supremacy once and for all, first we need to understand the history and the psychology behind it. White supremacy can be traced back to a combination of two major turning points in human history, colonization and the scientific revolution. When Europeans started to colonize the world around the 16th century, they ruthlessly killed and enslaved every indigenous population they came across." (The video shows 3 dotted lines showing the routes from Spain and England to South and Central America and a  sailing ship cruising down the coast of Africa with little explosions and booming in the background.)"
"The indigenous tribes were no match against European weaponry and power. (A ship pulls into shore with Europeans in Crusader garb as canon balls fly toward the black natives on the beach). And the Europeans concluded that if these tribes were so easily conquered, it must be because they were somehow inferior in power and intelligence (Black Africans are being marched onto the ship in chains).

OK...time for a reality check.
The slave trade in Africa can be traced back to before the year 600. The trading of slaves was in practice for over 900 years before the 16th century when the Spanish and Brits cruised down the African coast. In fact, slavery could be considered one of the original FUBU products (For Us By Us). For those completely unaware of world history, slavery is as old as mankind. Slavery has been in existence since the first time two factions engaged in conflict. Slavery had been in practice in Native American tribes on this continent prior to the arrival of the British slave trade.
In fact, after the British had outlawed the trading of slaves in 1807, they later ventured back to Africa in 1824 to try to end it there and wound up getting their asses kicked by the Ashanti Tribe. For seven years, until 1831 when a peace deal was brokered, the Ashanti kept kicking Brit butt. So much for that White Supremacy claim about greater weapons and easy conquest.....

A description is found here: Encyclopedia of World Trade

The description of European colonization and slavery is totally off the mark. And that's important to remember in a few minutes.

The video continues....

This booming colonization happened to coincide with the European age of enlightenment, a time when European philosophers and thinkers were trying to explain the world through science instead of religion. One of the first things they tried to explain was this experience of superiority over other indigenous cultures (Image of a Crusader knight and several blacks in chains).
We're then told that the "enlightened" came up with the concept of "racial biology".

The video goes on to say that science eventually debunked the whole concept of racial biology but that doesn't mean the Democrats in years past, tossed it aside.
Now for the tying together of these two concepts....slavery and racial biology are the basis for modern day white supremacy.

Very important imagery in this video. Notice Hitler on the left. Did you know that Hitler's program of extermination of undesirable people (Gypsies, the mentally and physically handicapped, Poles, gay persons and the Jews) was partially based on the pseudo-science of Eugenics and a woman named Margaret Sanger ? Do you know the name Margaret Sanger? She was a Progressive Democrat that believed in the theory of racial biology, which at the time was called Eugenics. It was used by Progressives to push for the sterilization of less desirable people and promote abortion for the good of society. Ms. Sanger went on to found what we know as Planned Parenthood. The video doesn't tell you that.
Notice also that we have the Battle Flag of Confederate Virginia. The Rebel flag. That flag has become a symbol for all of the Confederate States of America...and slavery. The slavery that caused the Democrat party in the South to secede from the United States and start their own sovereign nation. One which required all member states to allow slavery. Democrats left this country and started their own to further slavery. The video doesn't tell you that either.

Next is the biggest affront to truth in the entire video.

"It's crazy to think that the KKK can be traced back to who happened to have the biggest weapons 500 years ago".

And the screen morphs to this...

The creation of the Klan has nothing to do with who had the bigger weapons 500 years ago. It was started by 4 Confederates after their loss in the Civil War. The Democrats are trying to shift blame for their own creation onto the backs of European colonists in the 1500's.

I enlarged this for one reason. Notice the asterisk next to the word Supremacy in the upper right? Well, it's hard to make out, but the asterisk refers to the note in the lower left that says Now with White House Allies. You know.....President Trump. The Democrats that made this video say nothing about Andrew Jackson, who forced the native Americans onto reservations. Jackson was a member of the Democratic-Republican Party which split in 1824 into the Democrat and Whig Parties. He continued politics as a Democrat. They don't mention James Polk and his decimation of Mexicans in his carrying out annexation of Western territories. James Polk was a Democrat. The video doesn't mention James Buchanon who is described by Alternet as a President who “colluded with the Supreme Court to eliminate territorial barriers to slavery, opened the door to the expansion of the ‘peculiar institution’ [of slavery], and ultimately set the stage for the Civil War.” James Buchanon was a Democrat.
 And there is certainly no mention of Woodrow Wilson.
According to an article at Cheat Sheet, written in 2018..."The Huffington Post also counts Woodrow Wilson among the most racist presidents. The Atlantic reports that “The Virginia native was racist, a trait largely overshadowed by his works as Princeton’s president, as New Jersey’s governor, and, most notably, as the 28th president of the United States.” As president, he oversaw segregation in federal offices. Wilson once even threw civil rights leader William Monroe Trotter out of the Oval Office. The Post notes that Wilson backed what he characterized as the “great Ku Klux Klan.” He also championed the Klan’s violent disenfranchisement of southern African-Americans.
Woodrow Wilson was  Progressive Democrat.

I refer to my comments on the original Facecrook post when I say that this is a most egregious example of a lie of omission.  The KKK was created by the Democrat Party. No ifs, ands or buts about it. The Klan is a Democrat creation for the purpose of domestic terrorism against Blacks and Republicans. That's a fact. Over the years, the Klan has dissolved and reappeared and probably never went completely away. And over the years, the Klan has set their targets on not just Blacks and their supporters, but Jews, Eastern Europeans, Gays, Catholics and just about everyone that isn't white, southern and Protestant. But that last group wasn't automatically safe from the Klan because in the 1920's to 1960's the Klan in some areas would go after anyone they thought was going against their proclaimed moral authority.

The video, people at and will NEVER tell you that. Ever....the gutless cunts.

What the video does do is go on to tell you lies about white people. It states that increasing minority populations are causing fear in white people. That a lot of white people fear diversity. That these fears coupled with a lack of community, purpose and identity will foster white supremacy. And here enters another lie by Democrats.....identity. As of this day, Democrats have stripped white people of their identity by making the claim that if your identity is white, you are the problem. You are the reason there is white supremacy. It's a clever trick used by leftists throughout the ages. Personalize your argument against your foe and then attack. If you're white, and you take pride in your identity, you are the most vile creature on this earth and other identities are given free range in attacking you and your whiteness.

The video goes on to offer solutions to the problem they created.

1. Own your privilege. Know that you didn't do a damn thing to be in this country or to have grown up in a stable home. You are privileged. You didn't suffer the home wrecking tactics of the Democrats and their war on the stable minority family in the 60's by forcing able bodied Black males out of the home so the Government could provide. Want to know the number one reason for the explosion of single parent minority households? Look to the Democrats and their social engineering policies. But don't you fucking dare take pride in being white. You remember that celebrating your identity is verboten in today's Leftist world.

2. Support organizations that help people after leaving hate groups. This one I'm all for. I will support anyone that leaves the Democrat Party which is one of the biggest hate groups in recorded history. I would suggest becoming a Conservative or even a Pastafarian so long as you leave the Leftist//Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/Communist Democrats.

And remember.....according to the video, White Supremacists have to have violence. I would suggest leaving town the next time those Black Lives Matter/Antifa/Progressive/Occupy asshats decide to trash your community. They are only trying to intimidate you into following their identity politics game. They are vile racist organizations who refuse to own their history...and make you suffer for it.

Wednesday, March 25, 2020

The Disappeared

Like that...she's gone

The strange case of Rebecca Carnes....

The last couple of blog posts have dealt with Newtown resident, Rebecca Carnes. She was taken under the wing of Holohoaxer/Sandy Hooker Jim Fetzer and has since disappeared with the only trace being her unattended blog and a Change dot org petition. Poof.....









The only question I have is why.....

Thursday, February 20, 2020

Scratch A Hooker Find A Holohoaxer ©

It doesn't take long before they crawl out of the woodwork...

Rebecca Carnes on the "The Raw Deal" 2-14-20
Just before my last blog post, Rebecca Carnes made a repeat appearance on Jim Fetzer's The Raw Deal to explain her latest blog post on her petition.

Ms. Carnes stated at the beginning that her method is to basically call everyone a fake without get sued. Good luck on that sister. Now in this vid you hear Ms. Carnes make the grand statement that you can't practice with an AR-15 at an indoor range and Fetzer claim that the blood in Nancy Lanza's death bed was Raspberry jam. Real scholars here....

But the purpose of this post is to fill you in on what's going on behind the scene. Ms. Carnes' blog post at the Newtown Rooster has attracted a lot of attention and so far, 9 pages of comments. Now we know that Fetzer is a full fledged Holohoaxer © and I'm wondering why Ms. Carnes would align herself with that side of the roll of tin foil. 

What follows are some of the posts in the comment section on her blog....

Now, no Holohoaxer © worth his salt can go on an anti-Semitic diatribe without using a fake quote somewhere....

One huge problem with his Solzhenitsyn quote....the only person who suposedly heard him say it was former Klan Grand Wizard and convicted felon, David Duke...

But Bryson goes on and includes this little gem...

And what is Rebecca Carnes' reaction to all this? She responds to Bryson and another commenter with this...

If she's looking for facts, she's failing miserably......

Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Rebecca Carnes: Perspective from off the deep end

Hindsight used to be 20/20....yeah, um no. Them days is over...Remember our favorite Beto-basher? 

It's sad when your portfolio starts out with a booking photo..

 Well, she's been a busy lady the past month. Ms. Carnes was arrested right before the end of January for complaining about the 5G Smart Meter that Eversource Electric Utility attached to her house. You can read about that here:
If you keep up with F.A.R.T., then you'll know that I was wondering as to how someone that seemed pretty rational when she took on Beto the Bullshitter, could end up becoming the flavor-of-the-month in Jim Fetzer's box of assorted wing nuts.

Apparently, her arrest detailed above, was a catalyst. After her arrest, she reached out to Uncle Fetzer causing him to change his schedule and put Ms. Carnes on his internet show...

 You can listen here:

Coupled with her appearance was her initial entry in her Sandy Hoaxer Manifesto on Fetzer's blog, where Ms. Carnes showed us her Raff*-Sink-like photo skills, which I covered here...

I had a link to Ms. Carnes' blog, Newtown Rooster, but something happened. Since that posting, Ms. Carnes' blog has changed addresses. Here is what I found when I went to the link I posted in my F.A.R.T. blog....

Here's the cache version on January 3, 2020.(there's another for January 31, 2020 that I don't show)

(I've since corrected the dead link in my previous blog post)

Ms. Carnes has a new article on Uncle Fetzer's blog as well as her own...

She's upped the ante as a full fledged Sandy Hooker....

You can take a gander here:

Let's dissect her second entry into her Sandy Hoaxer Manifesto...

I'm not going to link to Fetzer's blog or her efforts. You can follow the link from her blog.

Ms. Carnes continues...

We'll get to her most serious concerns in a moment. Ms. Carnes has a pretty large list of claims in her post, all apparently based on recent information. I think she's being a little disingenuous. Ms. Carnes mentioned in her Bitchute appearance on Fetzer's show that she was aware of Fetzer and Wolfgang Halbigs claims in their huge best-seller bag-O-crap.  Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. But not all of her claims comes from them (kinda sorta). At the bottom of her blog post is this....

Clicking on that link takes you to this article by some Rambo-for-hire named Dan Erber....

If you read Erber's drivel, you find yourself thinking 'Where have I read this before?' read it in Wolfgang Halbig's bag-O-crap.....

So we have Carnes quoting Erber quoting Halbig as they all criticize the Sandy Hook Report issued by the State of Connecticut. It's amazing how high you can pile manure.

In a bit, I'm going to show excerpts from various documents contained in the Final Report by the State of Connecticut regarding the Sandy Hook Event. I am also providing a link to the report where you can download all of the documents.

Let's jump from the Halbig/Erber/Sandy Hoax circle jerk, to Ms. Carnes' grave concerns....

For some reason, this seems to be a huge concern among the Sandy Hookers. Halbig, Fetzer and others seem to think that everything hinged on a medivac helicopter being on the scene. The main problem with this is that other than the four people transported to the hospital by ambulance, everyone else was dead. There were only two children found wounded in the rooms full of dead bodies and they were transported to the hospital.
I'm not sure sure if Sandy Hookers understand the phrase "active shooter event". The law enforcement personnel that arrived on scene had to set up perimeter protection, access the building, search for person or persons shooting both inside and outside the building, secure areas, triage multiple victims and evacuate any wounded they found. They did that. It doesn't happen in seconds let alone minutes. For some reason, rationality is the first victim of Sandy Hookers.

Ms. Carnes continues.....

In concern #2, Ms. Carnes' is simply parroting Erber's tripe....

Erber is just an idiot with an over-inflated ego. This isn't the Marines storming the beach. No law enforcement agency is going to send unarmed EMS personnel into an active shooter scene until the site is secure. At 9:46:38, the site was unsecured. Erber doesn't go into detail as to what takes place in the next 5 minutes but what arm chair quarterback would? Multiple groups were already inside the school searching for suspects. The fire truck he mentions in the 3rd sentence of his bloviation doesn't arrive until 10:08:52. Adam Lanza (unidentified at this point) is found at 9:51:31 and Newtown Officer Smith radios in....(below is a partial transcript of the Newtown PD radio traffic)

Report Book 4 Document 00179629
None of the Hookers go into any detail as to what is actually going on. Par for the course. Kullgren was searching for shooters, checking victims, evacuating students and faculty, directing other officers and trying not to get anyone else shot in the process and 40 minutes later, happens to ask the dispatcher if he had a patient count. The motherfucker was busy... get off his back!

Ms. Carnes continues....

In the above, Ms. Carnes just breaks down Erber's crap into two sections. Both of them are not only incorrect in their claims about protocols but also go the extra mile to throw in some bizarre bullshit about saving organs. Where in the fuck does anybody come up with some proposed requirement to save organs, from kids with multiple gunshot wounds from a .223 Bushmaster rifle? Who the fuck has a warped enough mind to think this shit up? Rhetorical question, I know.....

For the record, there were a couple of law enforcement officers in the groups doing the room to room searches, that were certified EMTs. A third one was a Registered Nurse. Other officers used their basic first aid training to check vitals. As each group doing the room to room search entered each room, they checked for survivors. More than one group entered each room where there were victims. The victims were checked for vital signs multiple times before the actual pronouncement of death by Director of Danbury EMT, Paramedic Matthew Cassevechia, and two tactical Paramedics, John Reed and Bernie Meehan. Cassevechia arrived on site about 10:00 a.m., maintained phone contact with the Hospital and operated as the senior medical person on scene. The paramedics triaged the casualties operating on the legal authority granted by  Dr. Pat Broderick, Danbury Hospital.

As a former Combat Medic in the U. S. Army, let me make it simple for all those people getting hung up on organ saviors and protocols and blah blah blah and explain the triage system. You find a victim and you check for a pulse, while checking for the pulse you look for a raising chest and place your ear close to their mouth and nose for signs of respiration. Now they have fancy flow charts....

Now for you especially hard headed Sandy Hookers, let me simplify things....

Do you understand dead yet? If not, there's no hope so let's move on. Everything described up until this point was going on under the threat of an active shooter in or around the school. Even though one shooter was found dead in room #10, law enforcement was operating under the premise of a possible second (or more) shooter. The scene was not secure.

Ms. Carnes continues....

In Ms. Carnes' excerpt above, her quote contradicts her claim. Guerra doesn't mention Cario by name. Minor detail that doesn't mean much. So, let's look at Cario's actual statement and you decide if he was more concerned with photographing children than trying to save them...

Cario's statement is found in Book 6 Document #00026724. You can right click on the image, click view item, then hold the Ctrl button and hit the + button to enlarge...

If you have nothing better to do than criticize the actions of Sgt. Cario, you need to get a life. The man is one of several that should be commended for their actions that day.

But let's move on. Ms. Carnes' next grave concern...

The first document listed in the above section (Book 6 Document #00151276) consists of a Connecticut State Police (CSP) report form describing a cover letter from the ATF, a one page summary and narrative and an ATF report sheet. In the summary and narrative, you will find the following.....

It's true that Lanza shot himself. What's not true is that he encountered two Newtown Police Officers when he existed room #10. Based on the gunshots heard on the 911 calls made by persons in the school, dash cam videos and radio transmissions, it was determined that Lanza shot himself approximately one minute after the arrival of law enforcement on scene. He may have seen the first two officers arrive in the parking lot through the class room windows, but officers had not entered the school when the last recorded pistol shot was heard.

The second document listed above (Book 8 Document #00188555) consists of a CSP report sheet and a 28 page report from the Hoboken, New Jersey Police Department describing their activities in taking Ryan Lanza into custody on the afternoon of Dec. 14th. The Hoboken PD report begins with data that was entered into the computer when they received a call from the Connecticut State Police.

As seen here....

I'm not sure why this is such a concern to Ms. Carnes. The report issued by the State of Connecticut contains thousands of pages of reports, exhibits, witness statements etc. and there are going to be inconsistencies between some items relayed and recalled in such a chaotic environment. It's as if she wants this one inconsistency to be the reason to call the entire event into question.

She continues....

Sgt. Kullgren, Officer Chapman and Officer Smith arrived at the same time, heard gunfire and proceeded to the front of the school. Chapman states that the last shot he heard while advancing toward the school, using parked vehicles for cover, was a single pistol shot (this shot was picked up on recorded active 911 calls and dash cam videos). There was a radio broadcast by an officer on the east side of the building, that he had an unidentified man in custody. Sgt. Kullgren peeled off and headed down the east side of the building to help the officer on that side. Chapman and Smith went around the west side of the building. When they reached the south side and made eye contact with an officer there, they proceeded back to the front (north) side of the building.

While those three checked the perimeter of the school, Officer Penna, Lt. Venghele and Sgt. Bahamonde enter a door on the west side of the building and worked their way through the boiler room, kitchen and cafeteria then exited into the hall at the lobby. While they were in the lobby, Chapmand and Smith arrived back at the front entrance.

Sgt. Cario arrived with Lt. Hofbauer and Msgt. Davis. Like the others before them, they worked their way to the front entrance, using the cars in the parking lot for cover. They entered and joined the others in the lobby area. From Cario's statement...

Cario doesn't say who spoke. He quotes two statements; 1. they are dead, 2. it's been quiet about 5 minutes. There were several radio broadcasts relaying the term 5 minutes which was told to dispatchers by people making 911 calls. None of the reports covering any of the statements by anyone else in this group makes mention of the shooter ducking into a classroom. None. Lanza was dead before law enforcement entered the building.

Ms. Carnes then makes a flat out false statement..."This five-minute gap of no action by the Newtown Police in which the shooter was still alive is also confirmed in the above-referenced ATF statement (CSP File #00188555 Page 6 of PDF) by Investigating Officer Warren Hyatt and Primary Daniel Jewiss who noted, "...male was fatally wounded by police on scene."

Firstly, the ATF letter does not mention a five minute gap of no action. Anywhere. The latter part of her statement has the document link for the Hoboken PD reports about Ryan Lanza being taken into custody in New Jersey.

Officer Chapman makes reference to the last gunshot in his narrative about heading to the front of the building. After checking the west side, returning to the front and then the lobby, five minutes until Cario takes up a position behind them in the lobby, would not be far fetched.

Ms. Carnes then takes time for a little rant.....

Long answer.....shut the fuck up you insufferable, 7 year after the fact, non report reading, Fetzer echoing asshat.

Maybe it's time for a petition to ban this Fetzerette from the web.

The entire Sandy Hook Hoax has been completely debunked for years now. Jim Fetzer has been successfully sued for his defamation of Leonard Pozner. Alex Jones is going through the process now. It's understandable to have some questions about what took place that tragic day in Newtown. But Rebecca Carnes is making accusations in her internet appearances about people "in the loop", whatever the hell that means. I think her actions are pretty despicable when you take into consideration that the information is readily available for her to answer her own questions without stooping the level of Fetzer , Wolfgang Halbig or Dan Erber.

You can download the report and read for yourself. As a guide I would suggest the work of this person:

Or this one: